Hayes v. Leu
Hayes v. Leu
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
WINCHAUS A. HAYES,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 2:22cv287
D. LEU,
Respondent.
FINAL ORDER
Before the Court is a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. In his Petition, the pro se Petitioner seeks a reduction of his sentence pursuant to the First Step Act.
Id.On May 12, 2023, the Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 12. Petitioner did not file a response. The matter was referred for disposition to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)–(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), Local Civil Rule 72, and the April 2, 2002, Standing Order on Assignment of Certain Matters to United States Magistrate Judges. ECF No. 3. In a Report and Recommendation entered on November 3, 2023, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the relief sought by Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED, and the Petition be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ECF No. 16. The parties were advised of their right to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Neither Petitioner nor Respondent filed objections with the Court.1
1 The Report and Recommendation recommended dismissal of the Petition on the grounds that Petitioner has been released from custody. ECF No. 16. The Court mailed a copy of the Report and Recommendation to Petitioner at his last known address, and it was returned to sender as “UNABLE TO FORWARD.” ECF No. 17. Having reviewed the record and having heard no objection, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation on the grounds stated by the Magistrate Judge and ADOPTS and APPROVES the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, in its entirety as the Court’s own opinion. Accordingly, Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 12, is GRANTED, and the Petition, ECF No. 1, is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent. Petitioner is hereby notified that he may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Court at the Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date judgment is entered. Because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 335-36(2003). The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Order to Petitioner at his last known address and to counsel of record for Respondent. It is so ORDERED. Is/ ohA— Elizabeth W. Hanes United States District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia Date: February 12, 2024
Reference
- Status
- Unknown