Cooper v. Kennedy
Cooper v. Kennedy
Trial Court Opinion
AT ROANOKE, VA FILED July 18, 2024 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT LAURA A. AUSTIN, CLERK FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA jig Taylor ROANOKE DIVISION DEPUTY CLERK
THAD GILBERT COOPER, ) ) Civil Action No. 7:23cv00705 Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) C/O KENNEDY, ) By: Hon. Thomas T. Cullen ) United States District Judge Defendant. )
Plaintiff Thad Gilbert Cooper, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 17, 2024, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, and on June 18, the court issued a notice pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison,
528 F.2d 309, 310 th Cir. 2005). (See ECF Nos. 33 & 35.) The Roseboro notice gave Cooper 21 days to file a response to the motion to dismiss and advised him that, if he did not respond to the defendants’ motion, the court would “assume that fhe] has lost interest in the case, and/or that [he] agrees with what the Defendant[s| state[| in their responsive pleading(s).” (See ECF No. 20.) The notice further advised Cooper that, if he wished to continue with the case, it was “necessary that [he] respond in an appropriate fashion,” and that if he failed to file a response to the motion within the time allotted, the court “may dismiss the case for failure to prosecute.” (Id.) To date, Cooper has not responded to the defendant’s motion to dismiss or the court’s notice and, therefore, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
The Clerk shall send copies of this Memorandum Opinion and the accompanying Order to the parties. ENTERED this 18th day of July, 2024.
/s/ Thomas T. Cullen_______________ HON. THOMAS T. CULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown