Moore v. D.O.C.
Moore v. D.O.C.
Trial Court Opinion
CLERK'S OFFICE U.S. DIST. COL AT ROANOKE, VA FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 23, 2024 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LAURA A. AUSTIN, CLERK ROANOKE DIVISION BY: s/A. Beeson DEPUTY CLERK MARVIN MAURICE MOORE, ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 7:24cv00541 ) v. ) OPINION and ORDER ) D.O.C., ) By: Robert S. Ballou Defendant. ) United States District Judge Plaintiff Marvin Maurice Moore, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action against the defendant under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Department of Corrections, or D.O.C., is a state agency. As such, the D.O.C. is immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment unless the state consents to the suit. Alabama v. Pugh,
438 U.S. 781, 781(1978) (per curiam) (stating “[t]here can be no doubt that suit against the State and its Board of Corrections is barred by the Eleventh Amendment, unless [the state] has consented to the filing of such a suit.”). Further, the court cannot determine exactly what conduct Moore is complaining about, other than that he has been given “the run around” at all seven prisons he has been transferred to; he has made no factual allegations to show that a person acting under color of state law has violated his constitutional rights, which is required to state a claim under § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE this matter from the court’s docket. The Clerk is further directed to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to Moore. Enter: December 20, 2024 lol Kobed Ss. Ballon Robert S. Ballou United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown