IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ANDREW WELTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:24cev489 UNKNOWN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

action. Plaintiff's current allegations fail to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly,

(2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson,

(1957)). Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on December 6, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof. (ECF No. 12, at 2.) The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit a particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action. (ECF No. 12, at 2.) More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the entry of the December 6, 2024 Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the December 6, 2024 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. | fr ! / Date: \WA\aods M. Hann Richmond, Virginia United Stateb District Judge