Pilkins v. Carver
Pilkins v. Carver
Trial Court Opinion
CLERK'S OFFICE U.S. DIST. COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ee FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA January 24, 2025 ROANOKE DIVISION LAURA A. AUSTIN, CLERK BY: s/J.Vasquez JONATHAN LYNN PILKINS, ) Depo □□□□□ Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 7:24cev564 ) v. ) OPINION and ORDER ) SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL ) By: Robert S. Ballou JAIL AUTH.-TAZEWELL, et al., ) United States District Judge Defendants. ) Plaintiff Jonathan Lynn Pilkins, proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action against several defendants, pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging excessive use of force resulting in bodily injury. Defendant Southwest Virgina Regional Jail Authority—Tazewell (hereafter, SWVRJA) has filed a Motion to Dismiss SWVRJA from the case. ECF No. 15. I will grant the motion because the jail is not a proper party under § 1983. Section 1983 provides a cause of action against a “person” who, acting under color of state law, violates the constitutional rights of another.
42 U.S.C. § 1983; Loftus v. Bobzien,
848 F.3d 278, 284-85(4th Cir. 2017). Liability under § 1983 is “personal, based upon each defendant’s own constitutional violations.” Trulock v. Freeh,
275 F.3d 391, 402(4th Cir. 2001). A proper claim requires factual details about a defendant’s personal involvement in the violation of a plaintiffs rights. Wilcox v. Brown,
877 F.3d 161, 170(4th Cir. 2017). A jail is not a person within the meaning of § 1983 and lacks the capacity to be sued. McCoy v. Chesapeake Corr.
788 F. Supp. 890, 893-94(E.D. Va. 1992). Therefore, SWVRJA is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant from this suit, and the action will proceed against the remaining named defendants. Enter: January 23, 2025 lol Kobe S. Babllow Robert S. Ballou United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown