IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division TYRONE HOLLOWAY, ) Petitioner, Vv. Civil Action No. 3:25-cv-451-HEH CHADWICK DOTSON, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Successive § 2254 Petition) Petitioner, a Virginia prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

, challenging his convictions in the Circuit Court of the City of Williamsburg for abduction and rape. The Court previously has denied a

petition filed by Petitioner challenging these convictions. Holloway v. Walrath, No. 3:17CV683-HEH,

, at *1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2018). The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 restricted the jurisdiction of the district courts to hear second or successive applications for federal habeas corpus relief by prisoners attacking the validity of their convictions and sentences by establishing a “gatekeeping mechanism.” Felker v. Turpin,

(1996) (internal quotation marks omitted). Specifically, “[b]efore a second or successive application permitted by this section is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move

in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider

the application.”

(b)(3)(A). The Court has not received authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to file the present § 2254 petition. Therefore, the action will be

dismissed without prejudice for want of jurisdiction. A certificate of appealability will be

denied. An appropriate Final Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

MszAg— Henry E. Hudson Date: Tol, 9 2025 Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia