Roger Balthis v. Duffield Regional Jail
Trial Court Opinion
CLERE’S OFFICE U.S. DIST. COUR AT HARRISONBURG, VA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA May 29, 2026 RO ANOKE DIVISION LAURA A. AUSTIN, CLERK BY: S/J.Vasquez DEPUTY CLERK ROGER BALTHIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 7:26CV00308 ) ) OPINION ) DUFFIELD REGIONAL JAIL, ) JUDGE JAMES P. JONES ) Defendant. ) Roger Balthis, Pro Se Plaintiff.
The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because Balthis appeared to have been released from incarceration, the court entered an Order on April 14, 2026, directing that he pay the $405.00 filing fee, or otherwise respond. Balthis was warned that failure to pay the fee in full or respond to the court’s Order within thirty days would result in the immediate dismissal of this action without prejudice.
More than thirty days have elapsed and Balthis has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court concludes that Balthis may have lost interest in prosecuting this action and will, therefore, dismiss it without prejudice.
See Burrell v. Shirley, 142 F.4th 239, 249 (4th Cir. 2025) (providing that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides an explicit basis for courts to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders).
For these reasons, the Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice, and the case will be stricken from the active docket of the court. Balthis may refile the claims in a separate action once he is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.
A separate Judgment will be entered.
ENTER: May 29, 2026 /s/ JAMES P. JONES Senior United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.