General Court of Virginia, 1790

King v. Tarlton

General Court of Virginia · Decided May 15, 1790

2 Md. 473

Counsel

Thomas and Key, for the appellant., Stone and Merrick, for the appellees.

The Court

were of opinion that the said Cecil was a com» ietent witness, and directed him to he sworn.

The plaintiff excepted to this opinion.

Yerdipt and judgment thereon for the defendants.

Thomas and Key, for the appellant. Stone and Merrick, for the appellees.

The plaintiff appealed to the General Court, which Court affirmed the judgment of the County Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.