General Court of Virginia, 1800

Cornfute v. Dale

Cornfute v. Dale
General Court of Virginia · Decided April 15, 1800 · Chase
1 H. & J. 4

Counsel

Bullitt, for the plaintiff, contended,, J. Bayly, contra, for the defendant,

Cornfute v. Dale

Opinion of the Court

Chase, Ch. J.—

Assigned, among other reasons-for the decision in this case, that the action did not lie, because there was not a reciprocity of action, no action being maintainable against a master for an assault and battery committed by his slave; and that the injury to the slave was not dispunishable, it being indictable as an offence, and that without an injury or wrong to the master, no action could be sustained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.