Commonwealth v. Proctor
Opinion of the Court
THE prisoner was indicted in April 1791, in the District Court of Richmond, for having, on the 11th of December, 1790,feloniously and falsely made, forged and counterfeited, and for having caused and procured to be falsely made, forged and counterfeited, a certain writing obligatory purporting to be a power of attorney signed and sealed by one William Cosby, the tenor whereof is stated as follows; “ Know all men by these presents, that “ I William Cosby of the county of Chesterfield have “ requested, empowered, and appointed, and do by these
The prisoner was found guilty by the jury, and he moved in arrest of judgment, and assigned the following reason: “ Because the offence charged in the indict- “ ment aforesaid is not a crime, within the meaning of “ the act entitled “ an act against forgery.” The question was adjourned for difficulty, and the general court consisting of Tazewell, Tucker, and Tyler, judges, entered the following judgment. “ June 24, 1791. It is “ the opinion of the court that the offence as charged in “ the indictment against the defendant is not a crime “ within the meaning of the act entitled ‘ an act against w forgery’ and that judgment on the verdict ought to “ be arrested, and the said indictment quashed.” ■:
Vote. “ The act against forgery” under which Proctor was indicted, was passed on the 25th November, 1789,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.