Commonwealth v. Dowdall
Opinion of the Court
THE prisoner was indicted at the Dumfries District Court, in October, 1791, for feloniously uttering and passing in payment a counterfeit dollar, knowing the same to be counterfeit and base; the indictment concluded “ against the form of an act of the Convention of “ Delegates of Virginia in that case made and provided, a and against the peace and dignity of the common-"wealth.”
He was found guilty .by the jury, and on his being brought up to receive the sentence of the court, ha tendered the following reasons in arrest of judgment.
“ 1st. Because the crime with which he stands charg- “ ed, and for which he is indicted, was made and de-
“ 2d. Because the said ordinance was passed subse- “ quent to the formation, and passing of the bill of rights “ of this commonwealth, and cannot have the force of a “ law of the legislature of this commonwealth.”
“ Sd. Because the said convention were not delegated, “ authorized and empowered by the good citizens of “ this commonwealth to legislate generally for them; 5t more especially, to make penal laws to affect the lives u of the citizens of this commonwealth.”
“ 4th. That the said indictment is insufficient and “ wants form.”
The District Court considering the case a new one, with the consent of the prisoner adjourned it to the General Court. On the 19th November, 1791, that court consisting of Prentis, Tyler, Henry, and Roane, judges, decided “ That the indictment against. the prisoner is “ good and sufficient in law, and that the plea of the said “ prisoner in arrest of judgment on the jury’s verdict “ ought to be overruled.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.