Bailey's Case
Opinion of the Court
The essence of a plea of former acquittal, or conviction is, that he was legitimo modo acquietatus, &c. Here then it is necessary that the party should have been
2d. The court had not competent jurisdiction; the court has no jurisdiction in criminal cases beyond the letter of the act. That act authorizes the court only to do one of three things; viz. to consider, whether as the case may appear to them the prisoner may be discharged from further prosecution; may be tried in the county or corporation court, or must be tried by the district court. Now the act establishing county courts is express, that these courts shall not have jurisdiction in any case, where the judgment in case of conviction shall be for life or member,
3d. The record produced does not support either of these pleas. An acquittal must be final: so must a conviction: the court have neither acquitted, nor convicted; for they have sent him hither to be tried for the offence of manslaughter. Here then the opinion of the court is neither qn acquittal nor a conviction, but merely an opt-
Dissenting Opinion
dissented from the junior judge as to the record’s not supporting the pleas. He thought it did support them. Therefore the court being divided the judgment of the court was necessarily in favour of the prisoner, (See the district court law, ch. 66, sect. 16.) viz. that there is such a record. But as he concurred in the opinion that the county court had no right to discriminate betwen murder and manslaughter, the prisoner was put upon his trial upon the indictment for murder, and found guilty of manslaughter.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.