General Court of Virginia, 1823

Baker v. Commonwealth

Baker v. Commonwealth
General Court of Virginia · Decided June 15, 1823 · White
2 Va. 353
Baker v. Commonwealth

Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J.,

stated the Case, and delivered the opinion of the Court:

The petitioner, Brookes Baker, was presented by a Grand Jury, duly impanelled and sworn in a Court of Quarter Sessions of the county of Prince Edward, for an assault and battery, committed on a certain Nancy Davis. Upon this Presentment, an Information was duly and properly filed by order of that Court; an issue joined on the plea of “ not guilty,” and that issue, found for the Commonwealth.

On the trial of this Case, the Attorney prosecuting for the Commonwealth, produced the said Nancy Davis as a witness, to whose admission the Defendant’s Counsel objected, because the Presentment was found on her voluntary information, and she was answerable for the costs ; which objection was overruled, and an exception taken.

After the verdict was rendered, the Counsel for the said Defendant moved the Court for a new trial, which was refused ; whereupon, he moved the Court for leave to take down the evidence given on the trial, and spread it on the record; which motion was also overruled.

Under these circumstances, he applied in vacation to, and obtained from, a Judge of the General Court, a Writ of Error and Super-sedeas ; and afterwards, at the April Term, in the present year, the said Superior Court adjourned the following questions arising in the said cause, to this Court, for novelty and difficulty :

1. Is the prosecutrix a competent witness to prove the off en ce stated in the In formation ?

2. Ought the County Court, under the circumstances, and at the time stated, to have spread the evidence on the record ?

*3. May a Judge in vacation order a Writ of Error, as was done in this cause ?

Whereupon, this Court having maturely considered the premises, doth unanimously decide:

1. That the prosecutrix is a competent witness to prove the offence stated in the Information.

2. That the said County Court ought not, under the circumstances, and at the time *268stated, to have spread the evidence on the record.

3. That a Judge may not in vacation award a Writ of Error.

All of which is ordered to be certified to the said Superior Court!

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.