Reeves v. Preddy Funeral Home
Opinion of the Court
After review of the above-styled cases, the authorities cited to me, as well as authorities I have obtained through my own research, the Court is of the opinion that the pleadings filed are not valid, and, therefore, the cases must be dismissed.
The cases come before the Court upon a special appearance by the defendants, Preddy Funeral Home and Colonial Funeral Home, contesting the propriety of the suits filed for plaintiffs, Rita Sue Dockery and Joanne Reeves. These suits were filed by an attorney identified as Bob McD. Green, Johnson City, Tennessee, not licensed to practice in Virginia.
The authorities show that the filing of the suits signed by their out-of-state counsel is invalid because of failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 1 A:4 and Rule 1:4. Rule 1:4 requires that a pleading must be signed by counsel or
There are many cases on this subject in Virginia: Rahbaran v. Rahbaran, 26 Va. App. 195 (1997); Ortiz v. Barrett, 213 Va. 282 (1981); and this matter is thoroughly discussed in the circuit court opinion of Roubik v. White, 47 Va. Cir. 90 (Fairfax County 1998).
In the Roubik v. White case, Judge Klein discussed thoroughly that the Court’s only remedy would be to dismiss the case and further the Court would not have the authority to allow any amendments to relate back to the original filing date, thereby avoiding the consequences of any applicable statute of limitations.
Based upon these court cases and argument of counsel, the Court will dismiss the above two cases filed by attorney Bob McD. Green of Johnson City, Tennessee, in the Circuit Court of Scott County, Virginia.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.