reported the opinion of the court.

“This court (not deciding whether the judgment of the county court was erroneous in refusing leave to the appellee’s counsel to file the- eight pleas, mentioned in *339the bill of exceptions* on setting aside the office judgment) is of opinion that the judgment of the district court, reversing that of the county court, and rendering judgment for the appellee, is correct; so much ef the declaration in the canse as charges the non-payment of the several sums of money therein mentioned being insufficient, in point of law to sustain an action; and the issue joined, on the other part thereof, being found in the appellee’s favour. The judgment of the district court is, therefore-, on this ground, affirmed-”