Cookes v. Patriotic Bank of Washington
Cookes v. Patriotic Bank of Washington
1 Leigh 433
Opinion of the Court
The only point was the misnomer in the notice, of the principal obligor — John M. instead of George M. Cooke; the effect of which was, that the notice described a different forthcoming bond from that on which the motion was in fact made.
This court held the variance material and fatal, and reversed the judgment of the circiut court.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.