dissented. He was of opinion that the trustees and cestuis que trust had no actual notice of Campbell’s lien, either when Burke’s deed was made or when Dunlap conveyed to Burke; and that the retention of the title by the first vendor was not a constructive notice of the subsequent vendor’s lien; and. therefore Beirne having the legal title was entitled to the benefit of the defence of purchaser for value without notice.

Affirm the decree.