Commonwealth v. Harris & Hickman
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Meadowcroft v. People (Ill. 1896)
- State v. Griggs (W. Va. 1890)
- Glover v. Commonwealth (Va. 1889)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Upon the first question adjourned, this Court is unanimously of opinion, that two or more persons may be jointly indicted for retailing ardent spirits without a license.
Upon the second question, a majority of the Court is of opinion, that the judgment of the Hustings court of Danville for several fines of thirty dollars against each of the plaintiffs in error, is correct.
*Upon the third question adjourned, a majority, of the Court is of opinion, that judgment should be rendered in the Circuit court affirming the judgment of the Hustings court of Danville.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.