Sitlington v. Kinney's Adm'r
Sitlington v. Kinney's Adm'r
Opinion of the Court
This day came again the parties by their counsel, and the court having maturely considered the transcript‘of the record of the decree aforesaid and the arguments of counsel, is of opinion that the circuit court of Highland county erred in sustaining the demurrer to the appellant’s original and amended bill.
Whether the agreement set out in the original bill between the appellant and the appellee’s intestate (N. C. Kinney) be regarded as an executed contract or one that was executory only, it is plain that the allegations of the original and amended hills taken together, contain such averments of facts as, -if true (and upon demurrer they must be taken as true) constitute sufficient ground of relief in a court of equity, and which could not be set up by plea in an action at law, so as to afford to the appellant a complete and adequate remedy.
The court is therefore of opinion, and it is decreed and ordered that the said decree of said circuit court be reversed and an
Decree reversed.
Reference
- Status
- Published