Cockerille v. Dale's adm'r
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The court is further of opinion that it does not appear from the will that the testator intended to make the legacy liable to the charge prior to the real estate, both species' of property are chargeable pro rata with the maintenance and support of Rosanna during her life. Elliott v. Carter, 9 Gratt., 541. But it appears that only $575.00 of the stocks of which the legacy ■consists survive, which is insufficient to satisfy the .amount charged on the devise and bequest which is in arrear, and that the net proceeds of the sale of the land will not yield a sum sufficient to pay the annual charge for the maintenance and support of Rosanna Dale during her life. We are of opinion therefore that there is no error in the decree directing the fund to be paid to the executors to he administered in accordance with the provisions of the will.
But the fund may not be exhausted in the support and maintenance of Rosanna during her life. What remains, if any, is chargeable with the payment of the debts of John Dale. The decree is interlocutory, and the case has to go back; and the circuit court will
Decree aeeirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.