Turnbull v. Mann

Supreme Court of Virginia
Turnbull v. Mann, 94 Va. 182 (Va. 1897)
26 S.E. 510; 1897 Va. LEXIS 59
Harrison

Turnbull v. Mann

Opinion of the Court

' Harrison, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

*183The court is of opinion that the purpose of section 2198 of the Code was to afford a summary remedy for having the liens mentioned therein marked satisfied, where that duty has been neglected or for any cause has not been performed, upon proof that the debt has been actually paid or discharged, and was not intended to enable persons to have such liens marked satisfied because liable to be defeated by presumption of payment, or because barred by the statute of limitations.

The judgment of the lower court must, therefore, be reversed, and the motion dismissed without prejudice to the rights of either party thereto.

Reversed.

Reference

Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
1. Liens— When lobe marked satisfied—Section 3498 of Code.—The object of section 2498 of the Code is to afford a summary remedy for having marked satisfied the liens therein mentioned upon proof that the debt has been actually paid or discharged, and was not intended to enable persons to have such liens marked satisfied because liable to be defeated by presumption of payment, or because barred by the statute of limitations.