Harris v. Commonwealth
Harris v. Commonwealth
Opinion of the Court
Ho opinion was delivered, but the following order was entered by the court:
This day came as well the plaintiff in error, by counsel, as the Attorney General on behalf of the Commonwealth; whereupon the said Attorney General, being of opinion that this court would be compelled to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court of Fauquier county, rendered on the 2d day of October, 1909, upon the ground that the said circuit court erred in refusing to allow W. B. G. Shumate, foreman of the grand jury which
Therefore it is' considered by the court that the said judgment be reversed and annulled, the verdict of the jury set aside, and a new trial awarded the plaintiff in error.
Which is ordered to be forthwith certified to the said Circuit Court of Fauquier county.
Reversed.
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Witnesses—Competency—Grand Juror.—A grand juror may be called and examined on behalf of the accused to prove that the testimony of a witness called and examined on behalf of the Commonwealth on the trial of a case is in direct conflict, upon a material point, with the testimony given by that witness before the grand jury.