Robinson v. Christian
Robinson v. Christian
Opinion of the Court
Judgment or the Court.
This day came again the parties, by counsel, and the court having maturely considered the petition of the plaintiff, the answer of the respondent and the exhibits filed therewith and arguments of counsel, is of opinion, that the petitioner, E. S. Robinson, is the duly elected and qualified civil and police justice of the city of Newport News pursuant to constitutional and validly enacted statutes, and that on and since January 1, 1916, he has been unlawfully deprived of the powers, duties and emoluments incident to the said office by the respondent, T. J. Christian.
And it is further awarded that the service of a copy of this order upon the said respondent shall have the same force and effect as if a peremptory writ of mandamus was duly issued and served according to law.
Writ awarded.
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Statutes—Civil and Police Justice—Constitutional Lam.—The act of March 20, 1914 (Acts, 1914, p. 229), providing for the election of a civil and police justice in certain cities, and the act of February-11, 1915, amendatory thereof (Acts 1915, p. 69) are valid and constitutional enactments.