Commercial Savings & Loan Corp. v. Kemp
Commercial Savings & Loan Corp. v. Kemp
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of tbe court.
On October 7, 1912, A. L. Franklin and Elizabeth J. Franklin, his wife, became the joint owners in equal shares, in fee simple, of one acre of land and the buildings and improvements thereon, located east of Monroe, in Amherst county, Virginia. In 1913, A. L. Franklin died intestate, and his interest in the property descended to bis six children, Annie Pearl Jordon, Angie V. Steen, Ruby Green, Allie R. Franklin, Ottie T. Franklin and Dallas M. Franklin, subject to the dower right therein of his widow, Elizabeth J. Franklin. In 1915, Dallas M. Franklin departed this life, intestate,
On July 10, 1919, Elizabeth J. Franklin and the five surviving cMldren conveyed their eleven-twelfths interest in the property to S. V. Kemp, trustee, with general warranty, for certain purposes specified in the deed.
The deed provides as follows:
“But this conveyance is upon this trust, nevertheless, to secure a bond made by the said Elizabeth J. Franklin bearing even date herewith for the sum of 1303.00 and interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from the date hereof payable to said O. T. Franklin upon the death of the aforesaid Elizabeth J. Franklin.
“And upon tMs further trust that the said Elizabeth J. Franklin shall be permitted and allowed to remain in possession of said real estate and have the use of the same for and during the period of her natural life.
“After the death of the said Elizabeth J. Franklin the said trustee shall, at the request of the said O. T. Franklin, sell the aforesaid real estate by way of public auction on the premises, and the proceeds thereof shall be applied and distributed as follows:
“1st. To the payment of the costs of executing the trusts.herein declared, including the costs of executing and recording this deed of trust if the same shall not have been theretofore paid to the said O. T. Franklin.
“2nd. The residue in hand shall be by the said trustee, so far as necessary, applied to the payment of the burial expenses of the said Elizabeth J. Franklin; and
“4th. The net residue in hand shall be distributed equally to the aforesaid Annie P. Jordan, Angie Y. Steen, Ruby Green, 0. T. Franklin, and Allie R. Franklin.
“It is understood between the parties hereto that the interests of the three infant children of Dallas M. Franklin, a deceased son of the said A. L. Franklin, and heretofore inherited by them, are not conveyed or affected by this deed.”
This trust deed was duly recorded in the clerk’s office of Amherst county, on July 30, 1919.
In 1926, the Commercial Savings and Loan Corporation recovered judgments, aggregating $583.78, against Elizabeth J. Franklin and had them docketed in the Amherst county clerk’s office on January 28th of that year.
Mrs. Elizabeth J. Franklin died in February, 1926, leaving her children and grandchildren above named as her sole distributees and heirs at law.
O. T. Franklin requested that the real estate be sold by the trustee, and on April 19, 1926, S. Y. Kemp, trustee, and the five children of Mrs. Franklin filed a bill in the Circuit Court of Amherst county against the widow and children of Dallas M. Franklin, deceased, and W. D. Diuguid, Incorporated, undertakers, for the sale of the real estate conveyed to S. V. Kemp, trustee, by the deed of July 10, 1919, for partition, and for the application and distribution of the proceeds of the sale in accordance with the rights of the parties as set forth in said deed.
A decree was entered directing S. Y. Kemp, commissioner, to sell the property. O. T. Franklin became
On June 25, 1926, the Commercial Savings and Loan Corporation, the appellant, filed its petition in this suit setting up its several judgments against the estate of Elizabeth J. Franklin, deceased, and praying that the liens of said judgments be enforced against the proceeds of the sale of her shares in said real estate. All proper parties were made parties defendant to the petition and answered the same.
After a hearing on an agreed statement of facts, the petition and'answers thereto, a decree was entered on December 20, 1926, dismissing the petition. From that decree an appeal was allowed to this court.
The only assignment of error is the action of the court in entering this decree.
Appellant contends that the deed of trust is purely one to secure the payment of money; that the language of the deed does not constitute a charge against the estate of Mrs. Elizabeth J. Franklin for the payment of her burial expenses, nor grant any right to the five children mentioned in clause 4 of the deed; that a court of equity cannot administer the funds under its control according to the directions to the trustee, and that the contract between Mrs. Franklin and her children does not defeat the interest of a judgment lien creditor.
It plainly appears from the language of the deed of trust that it is not purely one to secure the payment of money. The grantors convey all their right, title and interest in and to the real estate to the trustee
Appellant’s contention is based upon the idea that there was a surplus belonging to Mrs. Franklin, remaining in the hands of the trustee after the payment of the debt secured, but there is no surplus since the deed makes final disposition of every dollar which was realized from the sale of the property.
Appellant’s judgments could attach as liens only to the interest of Mrs. Franklin, and as her entire interest in the real estate terminated at her death, there was no property or money to which they could attach.
The deed of trust in question is in effect a family settlement entered into by competent parties touching a lawful subject matter and is binding upon all parties thereto, and, when recorded, upon all purchasers from and creditors of the parties.
A judgment creditor can stand on no higher ground than his debtor. The notes upon which appellant’s judgments against Mrs. Elizabeth J. Franklin were obtained were executed two years after the trust deed was delivered and recorded, and her conveyance of her interest in the real estate is binding upon the appellant.
Appellant cites a number of cases in an effort
The merits of the case are clearly with the appellees, and the decree is plainly right and will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Commercial Savings and Loan Corporation v. S. V. Kemp, Trustees.
- Status
- Published