Craddock Moving & Storage Co. v. Settles
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision.
- Creative Designs Tattooing Associates, Inc. v. Parrish (Va. Ct. App. 2010)
- Perry v. Delisle (Va. Ct. App. 2004)
- Uninsured Employer's Fund of Virginia v. The Estate of Earle Lindsey Parrish, III, and (Va. Ct. App. 2010)
- Perry v. Delisle (Va. Ct. App. 2005)
- Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Derek M. Kramer (Va. Ct. App. 2000)
- Modern Renovations, LLC V. Dionel Sagastume Espino (Va. Ct. App. 2022)
- Sherman & Sherman Properties v. Peter L. Long (Va. Ct. App. 2011)
- Peter L. Long v. Sherman & Sherman Properties and Uninsured Employer's Fund (Va. Ct. App. 2011)
- American Zurich Insurance Company v. Jamie Martinez, Deybin Noel (David) Ortiz Gomez, etc. (Va. Ct. App. 2008)
- Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Gabriel (Va. Ct. App. 2005)
- MARK FIVE CONST. CO., INC. v. Gonzalez (Va. Ct. App. 2003)
- Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Tracy Scott Nunn, etal (Va. Ct. App. 2003)
- Gilbert J Perkey, t/a, etc v. Randall Wayne Fridley (Va. Ct. App. 2003)
- Andrea Marie Frey v. Gunston Animal Hospital (Va. Ct. App. 2002)
- Bois v. Blizzard (Va. Ct. App. 2002)
- Purvis v. Porter Cabs, Inc. (Va. Ct. App. 2002)
- Osborne v. Forner (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
- Mary Lee Frances Keene, Admini.etc v. Boothe, P&C (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
- Glenwood Edward Johnson v. M S Carriers, Inc., etal (Va. Ct. App. 1999)
- Mount Vernon Builders, Inc. v. Rotty (Va. Ct. App. 1998)
- Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Clark (Va. Ct. App. 1998)
- W & L Construct., etc. v. Herchel Sullivan (Va. Ct. App. 1997)
- Shelley Martin v. John M. Lang & Susan A. Lang, etc (Va. Ct. App. 1996)
- Alice Waggle v. John M. Lang & Susan A. Lang, etc. (Va. Ct. App. 1996)
- Charles Alan Staton v. Thomas E. Conner, etc (Va. Ct. App. 1996)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this case, we granted the petition for appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the Workers’ Compensation Commission did not err in ruling (1) that the claimant was an employee of the defendant and not an independent contractor, (2) that “once an employee proves that his or her injury occurred while employed in Virginia, an employer has the burden of producing sufficient evidence upon which the commission can find that the employer employed less than three employees regularly in service in Virginia,” and (3) that the employer failed to carry this burden. Craddock Moving & Storage Company v. Settles, 16 Va. App. 1, 427 S.E.2d 428 (1993).
We have considered the questions, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment below.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.