United States v. Lee Pon
Opinion of the Court
The appellants are said to be brothers, of the Chinese race, and their appeals from orders of deportation have been heard together. Lee Chick testifies that they are his only sons, bom in Sacramento, Cal. If this is true, they have as much right to be here as any person can have; if not true, they have none. He is corroborated by one witness, who may, however, be mistaken. The case depends mainly upon the testimony of Lee Chick. Several witnesses of his race have testified circumstantially to his calling a young man of Germantown, Pa., at several times, his only son. He denies the conversations, and says that young man is a deceased brother’s son, with whose history and whereabouts he seems well acquainted to within a short time. This person would he likely
070rehearing
Motion for Rehearing.
The additional evidence sought to be introduced, as it is made to appear, would not sufficiently meet the weakening of the testimony of Lee Chick by the government witnesses, and corroborate his testimony as to the birth of the appellants in the United States, to change the result. That they are his sons would more clearly appear, but that they were born in the United States would not. The motion must therefore be denied.
Motion denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.