Tobin v. Touchette
Trial Court Opinion
US ESTRCT COURT TRICT OF VERMORT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ped FOR THE u 9: 00 DISTRICT OF VERMONT 2 OCT 13 PAS CLERK MICHAEL TOBIN, ) Lawl ) oT EBTY CLEAR Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No. 2:19-cv-213 ) JIM BAKER, COMMISSIONER OF VERMONT ) DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ) CENTURION OF VERMONT, LLC, ) and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL A review of the docket in this case reveals the following: 1. On August 21, 2020, the court adopted the July 15, 2020 Report and Recommendation and granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Self- represented Plaintiff Michael Tobin was granted leave to amend his Complaint within twenty (20) days.
2. The court warned Plaintiff that failure to timely file an Amended Complaint would result in dismissal of his claims. (Doc. 13 at 3.)
3. No further filings have been received as of the date of this Order.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize dismissal of an action when “the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Although Rule 41(b) does not define “failure to prosecute,” the Second Circuit has held that “[i]t can evidence itself. . . in an action lying dormant with no significant activity to move it.” Lyell Theatre Corp. v. Loews Corp., 682 F.2d 37, 42 (2d Cir. 1982).
Because Plaintiff did not file an Amended Complaint, the court warned Plaintiff the failure to file would result in dismissal of his case, and the case has been dormant for nearly two months, this case is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.
SO ORDERED.
Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 3 day of October, 2020.
Christina Reiss, District Judge United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.