The Conrt directed the Jury, that if they found the defendant’s deed was originally made bona fide, yet if they found that he was knowing to Ivers’ purchase-a witness to his deed-received part • of the purchase money, and fraudulently concealed his own claiin. *49they aught not to allow so gross a fraud to prevail against a bona fide purchaser. It ought by a retrospect, to be considered as originally fraudulent, and designed for an imposition.

Verdict for the plaintiff.