Mix v. Whitlock
Supreme Court of Vermont
Mix v. Whitlock, 1 Tyl. 30 (Vt. 1801)
Mix v. Whitlock
Opinion of the Court
The rate-bill must be pi'oduced in evidence. It constitutes in this case an essential part of the plaintiff’s title.
Keyes then moved for a continuance of the cause, alleging, that the plaintiff had subpoenaed the constable with a duces tecum, commanding him to bring with him his proceedings under the act; that the constable was present, but had unfortunately omitted to bring the rate-bill, and it operated a surprise upon his client.
Let the cause be continued. And the Clerk make a docket minute, that the plaintiff tax no costs for the present term.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Samuel Mix against Joel Whitlock
- Status
- Published