Mix v. Whitlock

Supreme Court of Vermont
Mix v. Whitlock, 1 Tyl. 30 (Vt. 1801)

Mix v. Whitlock

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The rate-bill must be pi'oduced in evidence. It constitutes in this case an essential part of the plaintiff’s title.

Keyes then moved for a continuance of the cause, alleging, that the plaintiff had subpoenaed the constable with a duces tecum, commanding him to bring with him his proceedings under the act; that the constable was present, but had unfortunately omitted to bring the rate-bill, and it operated a surprise upon his client.

*35By the Court.

Let the cause be continued. And the Clerk make a docket minute, that the plaintiff tax no costs for the present term.

Reference

Full Case Name
Samuel Mix against Joel Whitlock
Status
Published