Supreme Court of Vermont, 1801

Sumner v. Wentworth

Supreme Court of Vermont · Decided January 15, 1801

1 Tyl. 42

Counsel

S. Miller, for the defendant,, Daniel Chipman, for appellee,, S. Miller objected, on the part of the defendant,, Daniel Chipman, e contra,, Hitchcock, for the defendant., Daniel Chipman, for the motion., Hitchcock, e contra. , Nathaniel Chipman, in support of the motion., Nathaniel Chipman, Darius Chipman, Daniel Chipman, Amos Marsh, and T. Squires, for plaintiff., S. Hitchcock, S. Miller, and C. Smith, for defendant.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment of Court.

New trial not granted. Motion dismissed with costs.

And now, on review, January term, A. D. 1801, the cause went again to the Jury. Exception was again taken to the deed’s being read in evidence. Further argument was heard, and the Court finally *59decided, that the deed could not be read to the Jury-in support of the plaintiff’s declaration.

Nathaniel Chipman, Darius Chipman, Daniel Chipman, Amos Marsh, and T. Squires, for plaintiff. S. Hitchcock, S. Miller, and C. Smith, for defendant.

Plaintiff nonsuited.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.