James v. Smith
James v. Smith
1 Tyl. 128
James v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
I have generally erased intervening damages, when a recognisance has been presented, to me for signature, as I would have the conditions of the recognisance to rest entirely on the statute.
But this recognisance is said to be predicated on the common law practice, If this be true, it is
Curia advisare vult.
At the ensuing term, the Court chancered the bond of recognisance to a sum merely nominal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.