Supreme Court of Vermont, 1801

Pierce v. Hindsdall

Pierce v. Hindsdall
Supreme Court of Vermont · Decided February 15, 1801
1 Tyl. 153

Pierce v. Hindsdall

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The witness is inadmissible. He shall not be permitted to testify that he had no property in the chattel vended by him as his property. *155He is consequently interested in the event of this suit. Plaintiff had his remedy against the witness or the defendant at his election. A judgment in favour of the plaintiff in the present action might, by the witness, Howard Pierce, be pleaded in bar to a future action, which the present plaintiff might hereafter institute against him.

Jonathan Robinson, for plaintiff. Israel Smith and-- — —,' for defendant,

Witness incompetent,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.