Supreme Court of Vermont, 1801

Culver v. Barnet

Culver v. Barnet
Supreme Court of Vermont · Decided August 15, 1801
1 Tyl. 182

Counsel

Counsel for defendant., Counsel for the plaintiff., Titus Hutchinson, for plaintiff., Charles Marsh, for defendant.-

Culver v. Barnet

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The action now stands on the two last counts. The paper offered in evidence shews a special contract. It cannot be read in evidence in support of either of the general counts. To support general counts for work and labour done, &c. plaintiff must shew it was done at the special instance and request of the defendant, or for his benefit. This paper goes to shew a special contract to permit the *186cutting and removing of certain trees and timber; and the gist of the action, as stated in the first count, is the obstruction in removing them. This surely Cannot apply to either of the counts. The paper cannot be read to the Jury.

Titus Hutchinson, for plaintiff. Charles Marsh, for defendant.-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.