Lazell v. Pinnick & Matson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Lazell v. Pinnick & Matson, 1 Tyl. 247 (Vt. 1801)
Smith
Lazell v. Pinnick & Matson
Opinion of the Court
Too much time should not be consumed by counsel in arguing points so clear and so repeatedly decided. It has been ruled by this Court, that even where a person was made drunken, and enticed to sign a promissory note, he was after-
concurred in opinion with the Chief Judge; and witnesses to prove the insanity of the intestate at the time of signing the memorandum, were admitted,
Verdict for the defendant.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John Lazell, against Pinnick and Matson, Administrators on the estate of Daniel Gilman, intestate
- Status
- Published