Supreme Court of Vermont, 1803

Sandford v. Rose

Sandford v. Rose
Supreme Court of Vermont · Decided May 15, 1803 · Absente, Jacob
2 Tyl. 428

Sandford v. Rose

Opinion of the Court

Curia. (Jacob, Assistant Judge, absente.)

The Court are of opinion, that the evidence may be well admitted. The construction of the statute “ regulating the conveyances of real estate, and for the prevention of frauds therein,” contended for by the de*431fendant’s counsel, cannot be correct; for it would go to convert a beneficial statute, made expressly for the prevention of fraud, into an engine of fraud. "

Chauncey Langdon and Darius Chipman, for plaintiff.

The evidence will be admitted.

The cause was continued for trial, and afterwards, on the decease of Rose, was accommodated.

--, for defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.