Sandford v. Rose

Supreme Court of Vermont
Sandford v. Rose, 2 Tyl. 428 (Vt. 1803)
Absente, Jacob

Sandford v. Rose

Opinion of the Court

Curia. (Jacob, Assistant Judge, absente.)

The Court are of opinion, that the evidence may be well admitted. The construction of the statute “ regulating the conveyances of real estate, and for the prevention of frauds therein,” contended for by the de*431fendant’s counsel, cannot be correct; for it would go to convert a beneficial statute, made expressly for the prevention of fraud, into an engine of fraud. "

Chauncey Langdon and Darius Chipman, for plaintiff.

The evidence will be admitted.

The cause was continued for trial, and afterwards, on the decease of Rose, was accommodated.

--, for defendant.

Reference

Full Case Name
Amos Sandford, against Samuel Rose and another
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published