Treasurer of the State v. Merrill
Treasurer of the State v. Merrill
Opinion of the Court
These actions have been treated like any other civil action, so far as exceptions are concerned, and either party, against whom any question was decided, has always been permitted to present his bill for allowance, and to bring the case into this court.
Another question was made, whether it was sufficient that the bill of exceptions was signed only by the chief judge of the county court.
By the Court. — The statute, chap, xxv, <§> 37, expressly provides that exceptions to the opinion of the county court, on any question of law which may arise on the trial of any civil cause, shall be signed by the presiding judge. Having determined that this is to be treated like any other civil cause, in regard to exceptions, it follows that there is no necessity that the bill of exceptions should be signed by any more than the presiding judge.
Another question was made in regard to the point of precedence in the argument.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Treasurer of the State v. Arad Merrill and Jacob Maeck
- Status
- Published