Willian T. Gleason & Co. v. Hobart
Willian T. Gleason & Co. v. Hobart
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The account of the plaintiffs against the de
It appears that the plaintiffs gave directions to their attorney to have the money so applied, before the commencement of this suit, but, through the neglect of their attorney, this was not done until after. The defendants paid the balance of their note, and thereby ratified this appropriation, and received the benefit of it; and they, in fact, received this very sum of five dollars, when they paid the balance of the note and took up the same; and this was before the account was audited. The defendants, therefore, at the time the account was audited, had no claim whatever on the plaintiffs for this sum. The argument, which has been had in relation to the appropriation of'payments made, is not applicable to the case before us. We can see no ground for the defendants to recover this sum of five dollars.
The judgment of the county court must therefore be reversed, and judgment is rendered for the plaintiffs to recover the sum of three dollars and fifty two cents, found due by the auditor, and the interest on the principal sum of three dollars and twenty six cents to this date.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Willian T. Gleason & Co. v. Caleb Hobart and Caleb E. P. Hobart
- Status
- Published