Shloss v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Vermont
Shloss v. Cooper, 27 Vt. 623 (Vt. 1855)
Redfield
Shloss v. Cooper
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The only question made in the present case is in regard to the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s title to maintain trespass.
It must be admitted, on all hands, we think, in the present case, that the general property in the goods remained in the plaintiff’s, and we think they had, also, the right to the immediate possession of all such of them as at any time remained unsold, and that they might, therefore, well maintain trespass. Judgment affirmed,
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Simon Shloss and Joseph Heilbronner v. Jesse Cooper and Harris Smith
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- The plaintiffs delivered to K. certain giods, which he was to sell on commission, at certain specified prices, or return the same on demand: the defendants attached said goods, aa the property of K., and the plaintiff sued them in trespass therefor. Held, that the general property in the goods unsold and attached, and the right to the immediate possession of them, remained in the plaintiffs, and that they could maintain the action of trespass.