Pierce v. Kusic
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re D'Avignon (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont 1981)
- Weaver v. First National Bank (Kan. 1907)
- Martin v. Harrington (Vt. 1901)
- Hyser v. Mansfield (Vt. 1899)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The Homestead Act provides that “ the homestead of a housekeeper or head of a family, consisting of a dwelling-house, out-buildings, and the land used in connection therewith, not exceeding five hundred dollars in value, and used
Perry Marsh was a housekeeper, and used the demanded premises as a homestead, which in character and value fulfilled all the requirements of the statute, and the case comes not within its exception.
Therefore said premises were exempt from attachment and execution.
• Let the judgment be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.