Wright v. Taplin & Rowell
Wright v. Taplin & Rowell
Opinion of the Court
Town clerks may administer oaths when the instrument to be sworn to is “ returnable ” to their office. R. L. 2,689. This means when the instrument must be deposited in their office or filed and recorded there, either to make it good at all or good as to third persons or against the world. The word returnable, as here used, must have
Chattel mortgages, in order to be good against the world, must be recorded in the proper town clerk’s office, unless possession of the property is delivered to the mortgagee. Hence, they may be sworn to before the proper town clerk.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- J. F. WRIGHT v. TAPLIN & ROWELL
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published