In re Nelson's will
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ainger v. White's Admrx. (Vt. 1912)
- Fadden v. Fadden (Vt. 1918)
- In re Hathaway's Will (Vt. 1903)
- Laird v. Perry (Vt. 1902)
- Sowles v. Harr (Vt. 1901)
- In re Rooney (District Court, D. Vermont 1901)
- In re Marsh (District Court, D. Vermont 1901)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Any real estate which the appellant Lizzie may take as an heir of the testator will not be her separate estate, which involves as the characterizing fact, that she will hold it to her sole use in exclusion of the marital rights of her husband. Frary v. Booth, 37 Vt. 78; Hubbard v. Bugbee, 58 Vt. 172. And her husband, the appellant George H., will be entitled to the rents and profits of it during coverture. Hackett v. Moxley, 68 Vt. 210. He therefore properly joined in the appeal.
Judgment affirmed and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.