Supreme Court of Vermont, 1923

Laplante v. Camp

Supreme Court of Vermont · Decided April 3, 1923 · Miles, Powers, Slack, Taylor, Watson

96 Vt. 412; 120 A. 860; 1923 Vt. LEXIS 187

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Burlington Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cummings (Vt. 1941)
Finn v. Holden (Vt. 1934)
Royal Bank of Canada v. Girard (Vt. 1927)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Miles, J.

This is an action to recover damages caused by an injury resulting from a collision between the motorcycle of the plaintiff and the automobile of the defendants. The case was heard by court and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.

The only exceptions raised and relied upon by the defendants are (1) “to the failure of the court to find as requested by them in their requests for further findings,” and (2) “to the findings as made,” and (3) to the judgment.

*413Of exceptions (1) and (2) it is enough to say that they point out no error and are too general to require attention. Landon v. Hunt, 82 Vt. 322, 73 Atl. 865; Platt v. Shields et al., 96 Vt. 257, 119 Atl. 520.

As no question is raised by the exceptions as to the sufficiency of the findings to support the judgment rendered, this Court will not look back of the findings to test the sufficiency of the evidence to. support the judgment. Morgan v. Gould et al., 96 Vt. 275, 119 A. 517. The exception to the judgment is not well taken.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.