Shaw v. Barrows

Supreme Court of Vermont
Shaw v. Barrows, 359 A.2d 651 (Vt. 1976)
134 Vt. 343; 1976 Vt. LEXIS 671
Barney, Smith, Daley, Larrow, Billings

Shaw v. Barrows

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The parties in this case came to the lower court seeking a clarification and declaration of legal rights and relationships existing between them, a remedy authorized by law. See 12 V.S.A. § 4711. The purpose of a declaratory judgment is to enunciate, so far as is requested and appropriate, the rights of the parties. Graves v. Town of Waitsfield, 130 Vt. 292, 292 A.2d 247 (1972). Clarification was not forthcoming and the entitlement to declaration was not carried out. The matter must be reversed and remanded for a proper resolution of the issues because of errors in both the determination of the facts and the failure to properly apply the proper postulates of the law.

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
Francis M. Shaw D/B/A Wallingford Gas & Oil v. Alton Barrows, Admr. of the Estate of Michelle Barrows, Et Al. and Adirondack Bottled Gas Corporation of Hudson Falls, Et Al.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published