State Of Washington v. Justin E.critchell
State Of Washington v. Justin E.critchell
State Of Washington v. Justin E.critchell
Opinion
-'0'^ i [; •S'l^TF P^ 1£-<'' C''"V",'r. '•'•'
2011. APR-7 AH 9: 52 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69247-0- Respondent, v.
JUSTIN ERIN CRITCHELL, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. FILED: APR - 7 2014
Per Curiam — Justin Critchell appeals his convictions for third and fourth degree assault, arguing that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it had a "duty to return a verdict of guilty" if it found all the elements of each offense beyond a reasonable doubt. This argument is controlled by our decision in State v. Ryan P. Moore, No. 69766-8 (Wash. February 18, 2014) and the cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
FOR THE COURT:
OeckeJ^ <4xX
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.