Union Bank, N.a. v. Scott J. Edwards, John & Marion Bechtholt, Et Ux
Union Bank, N.a. v. Scott J. Edwards, John & Marion Bechtholt, Et Ux
Opinion
FILED COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I 2015 MAR 17 AM 8: 42 STATE'- V' S tl BY
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
UNION BANK, N.A., No. 45966 -3 -II
Appellant,
v.
SCOTT J. EDWARDS, an individual; and UNPUBLISHED OPINION JOHN W. BECHTHOLT and MARION A.
BECHTHOLT, husband and wife,
Respondents.
LEE, J. — Union Bank appealed a trial court judgment in favor of Scott Edwards, John
Bechtholt and Marion Bechtholt. The parties now stipulate that that judgment should be vacated
and the case be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Washington Federal v. Harvey _ Wn.2d —, 340 P. 3d 846 ( 2015). The parties further stipulate that Union
Bank should be awarded its costs on appeal of $851. 79 and that the issue of Union Bank' s fees on appeal should be determined by the trial court on remand.
No. 45966 -3 - II
We accept the parties' stipulation. The trial court judgment is vacated and remanded to the
trial court. Union Bank is awarded its costs on appeal and the issue of Union Bank' s fees on appeal is remanded to the trial court.
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2. 06.040,
it is so ordered.
We concur:
Vie. —rt.
FBjorgen, A.C. J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.