Union Bank, N.a. v. Raymond E. Pelzel
Union Bank, N.a. v. Raymond E. Pelzel
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
UNION BANK, N.A., as successor-in- No. 70869-4-1 interest to the FDIC as Receiver for Frontier Bank, ro» o Appellant, a t»o
v. 5D -n -,, CO <-cr RAYMOND E. PELZEL, an individual, 3* and the marital community of §2o RAYMOND E. and MERILEE PELZEL; to £T>GO —<o PELZEL DEVELOPMENT, INC., a —
\o z< Washington corporation; KAREL A.
PELTRAM, an individual, and the marital community of KAREL A. and AMY M. PELTRAM; KAREL Z.
PELTRAM, an individual, and the marital community of KAREL Z. and LIBUSE PELTRAM; RANDY L. UNPUBLISHED OPINION CAMPADORE, an individual; and CROSSMARK CAPITAL LLC, a FILED: April 13,2015 Washington limited liability company, Respondents. TATEURT Per Curiam — Following the Washington Supreme Court's decision in Washington Federal v. Harvey Wn.2d , 340 P.3d 846, 2015 WL 114165 (2015), the parties in this appeal filed a stipulation to the reversal of"the Superior Court's orders granting the defendant guarantors summary judgment and their attorneys' fees and the judgment resulting from those orders." The parties also No. 70869-4-1/2
stipulate that the trial court on remand shall determine the amount of any award for attorney fees and costs incurred in the appellate proceedings.
We accept the parties' concession, reverse, and remand for further proceedings.
FOR THE COURT:
A^tsAf jf.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.