(;: j(ii: ;' H/i.\';i.'.‘i i= ZWBNUViS §H 8:@2 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASH|NGTON STATE OF WASHENGTON, ) ) No. 77295-3-| Respondertt, ) ) DlViSiON ONE v. ) ) MOHAMED D. DUKULY, ) UNPUBLiSi-!ED OPiN|ON ) ) FiLEi:); NU"<! ?`Q‘?ii"i& PER CuRlAM. Mohamed Dukuiy appeais his conviction for first degree Appe|iant. robbery, arguing that a statute (RCW 13.04.030) requiring his prosecution in adult court vioiates procedurat and substantive due process The same arguments Were recentiy rejected in, and are controlled by, the Washington State Supreme Court’s decision in State v. V\Iati<ins, w Wn.2d _ , 423 P.3d 830, 832 (2018).

Afiirmed.

For the Couri: