Court of Appeals of Washington, 2020

State Of Washington v. Chris Ann Wickham

State Of Washington v. Chris Ann Wickham
Court of Appeals of Washington · Decided October 12, 2020

State Of Washington v. Chris Ann Wickham

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 80769-2-I ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) CHRIS ANN WICKHAM, ) ) Appellant. ) PER CURIAM — Chris Wickham appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following her conviction for felony driving under the influence. She contends that the trial court waived all discretionary legal financial obligations (LFOs), but that the judgment and sentence requires her to pay the costs of supervision by the Department of Corrections (DOC). The State concedes that this condition should be stricken because Wickham was indigent, and the sentencing court clearly intended to impose only mandatory legal financial obligations. See State v. Lundstrom, 6 Wn. App. 2d 388, 396 n.3, 429 P.3d 1116 (2018) (costs of supervision are discretionary); State v. Dillon, 12 Wn. App. 2d 133, 152, 456 P.3d 1199 (2020) (striking DOC supervision fee where “[t]he record demonstrate[d] No. 80769-2-I/2

that the trial court intended to impose only mandatory LFOs”). We accept the State’s concession, and remand to the trial court to strike the supervision fee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.