State Of Washington, V. David Ace Mikeals

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two June 15, 2021

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 53455-0-II

Respondent, v.

DAVID ACE MIKEALS, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appellant.

LEE, C.J. — David A. Mikeals was convicted of residential burglary, possession of a controlled substance, and bail jumping. Mikeals appeals only his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, arguing that the statute criminalizing simple possession is unconstitutional. Based on our Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Blake,1 we agree. Therefore, we reverse Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled substance and remand to the trial court to vacate that conviction and to resentence Mikeals on his remaining convictions.2 No. 53455-0-II

FACTS

Following a jury trial, Mikeals was convicted of residential burglary, possession of a controlled substance, and bail jumping. Mikeals appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance.

ANALYSIS

Mikeals argues that his conviction for possession of a controlled substance is unconstitutional. We agree.

In Blake, our Supreme Court held that RCW 69.50.4013(1), the statute criminalizing simple possession, is unconstitutional. 197 Wn.2d at 186. Therefore, the statute is void. Id. at 195. Because RCW 69.50.4013(1) is void, Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled substance is invalid. See In re Pers. Restraint of Hinton, 152 Wn.2d 853, 857-58, 100 P.3d 801 (2004).

We reverse Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled substance. We remand to the trial court to vacate Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled substance and to resentence Mikeals on his remaining convictions.

No. 53455-0-II

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

Lee, C.J.

We concur:

Worswick, J.

Glasgow, J.