Georgia Co. v. Richfield Oil Co.
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts as above).
Compensation for services in rendering assistance to a ship at sea or her eargo, or both, from impending sea peril, when successful and voluntary, is a maritime lien upon the ship or eargo, or both and may be impressed in rem (Admiralty Rule 18 [28 USCA § 723]); and, where the owners or underwriters employ such services, proceedings-in personam against the employer may be had. The Sabine, 101 U. S. 384, 25 L. Ed. 982. There is no authority to proceed against the ship in rem and in personam against1 the employers in the same libeL The Sabine, supra.
The ship and cargo have not common status. Each has a separate underwriting and other relations, although the ownership may be common. _ The ship has preferred mortgage status (sections 922-953, tit. 46, USCA), which would be imperiled by cargo salvage claim, and the integrity of preferred security by bona fide holders would be impaired. While there is no Evidence of such lien, the rule would have general application, and it would be manifestly inequitable and would create confusion, and is beyond the court’s power to change the existing status and engraft on the procedure, against rule and admiralty practice or precedent, personam claim for cargo salvage, upon this record, in a proceeding in rem against the ship.
Exception sustained, and that part stricken.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.